Gregory Lott - April 27, 2004 -Stay of Execution
Concerns:
1. Gregory Lott has consistently maintained his innocence of the murder, while admitting that he burgled the house.
2. The Ohio Supreme Court acknowledged in 1990 that Lott had been convicted of the murder on circumstantial evidence, and in 2001, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said that 'this is the most troubling aspect of the case'.
3. There is concern that the Department of Corrections determined Gregory Lott's IQ to be 72. The US Supreme Court ruled on June 20, 2002 that the death penalty for people with mental retardation is unconstiutional.
4. The prosecutor did not turn over to the defense the description that John McGrath had given police, or his belief that he and his attacker went to the same barber, or the information that McGrath had not identified his assailant from the sketch. The defense was therefore denied important evidence with which to contest the prosecution's version of events.
5. Gregory Lott's previous appeal lawyer discovered the withheld evidence in 1991. However, he failed to present it in the state appeal courts. His failure to do so has meant that federal courts have not reviewed it.
read more about Gregory Lott
Jerome Campbell –granted clemency 2004
Jerome Campbell’s case includes the worst elements of the death penalty as it is practiced in the United States: a faulty eyewitness, jailhouse snitches, and ineffective legal representation for a defendant who could not afford an attorney. Moreover, Hamilton County’s case against Campbell relied on evidence that was highly circumstantial.
read more about Jerome Campbell
Richard Cooey - Execution delayed since July 24, 2003
A three judge panel convicted Cooey of four counts of aggravated murder, two counts of rape, two counts of kidnapping, two counts of aggravated robbery and one count of felonious assault, all while Cooey maintained his innocence. During the trial, Cooey attempted to prove that he could not have committed the crime, based on his level of intoxication and drug use. The panel refused to allow expert testimony into the trial. Mitigating evidence was introduced during the sentencing phase of the trial, showing that Cooey had suffered severe mental and physical abuse, abused alcohol and drugs, and had a mental disorder that was aggravated by the drug and alcohol use.
read more about Richard Cooey